Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Xiaomi Technology India Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 20721 of 2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/11/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Xiaomi Technology India Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)

CESTAT Bangalore held that web cameras are rightly classifiable under Chapter Heading 8473 and not under 8525 as web cameras are not digital camera nor it can be considered as a television camera.

Facts-

The appellant M/s. Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited imported Mi Web Camera classifying the same under Chapter Heading 8473 3099 as parts and accessories of Automatic Data Processing (ADP) Machines. The original authority and the Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order classified the said products under Chapter heading 8525 8010 in view of the fact that the web camera imported by the appellant was standalone item unlike in other cases where the web camera was imported along with the ADP machine.

Conclusion-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031