Case Law Details
ACIT Vs Saluja Construction Co. Ltd (Delhi High Court)
Introduction: In a recent case, the Delhi High Court addressed the critical issue of whether reassessment proceedings under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act could be initiated in the absence of incriminating material. The case, ACIT vs. Saluja Construction Co. Ltd., Assessment Year (AY) 2008-09, examined the validity of such proceedings and their compliance with tax law. This article delves into the case, the analysis, and its legal implications.
Detailed Analysis: The case revolves around an assessment for AY 2008-09, where the Assessing Officer (AO) added Rs. 3,50,00,000 to the taxable income of the assessee under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. This addition was considered undisclosed income and was a result of a search and seizure operation conducted at the assessee’s premises on 12.01.2012 and 11.09.2013.
Notices under Section 153A of the Act were issued, and the assessment for AY 2008-09 was completed on 23.03.2016. The assessed income, after the addition, was determined to be Rs. 7,89,74,840.
However, the key issue in this case was whether the reassessment proceedings under Section 153A were legally valid. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) found that since no incriminating material was discovered during the search, the reassessment proceedings should not have been initiated. The Tribunal emphasized that assessments for completed years could only be revised if based on incriminating material found during the search. Without such material, no additional tax could be levied.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
