Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Laxmi Narayan Transport Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 76924 of 2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/09/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Laxmi Narayan Transport Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)

CESTAT Kolkata held that composite contract involving transportation of goods and loading/unloading, packing/unpacking, etc. will be treated as a contract for transportation only as the other services are naturally bundled together with the principal service of transportation. Accordingly, service tax leviable under GTA service and not under cargo handling service.

Facts- The Central Preventive unit(CPU) of Central Excise and GST Commissionerate, Bhubaneshwar, initiated an investigation against the Appellant, M/s Laxmi Narayan Transport, on the allegation that they have failed to discharge Service tax on the services provided to M/s. Sanjay Sahani Transport Agency (P.) Ltd. (SSTAPL) and M/s. Jindal Stainless Limited (JSL).

Thereafter, a Show Cause Notice dated February 14, 2018 was issued to the Appellant demanding Service tax of Rs.3,16,39,804/- along with interest and penalty for the period 2012-13 to 2016-17, by invoking extended period of limitation. The said demand was computed on the basis of TDS Certificates in form 26AS issued by the Income tax The said Notice was adjudicated by the Commissioner vide impugned order dated 02.05.2019, wherein the demand of service tax made in the notice was confirmed along with interest and penalty, by classifying the service rendered by the Appellant as ‘Cargo handling service’. Aggrieved against the impugned order, the Appellant has filed the present appeal.

Conclusion- Held that when a composite contract is entered into between parties for transportation service including various intermediate or ancillary services provided in relation to the principal service of road transport of goods such as loading/unloading, packing/unpacking, transhipment etc., which are provided in the course of transportation, such contract cannot be vivisected. It will be treated as a contract for transportation only as the other services are naturally bundled together with the principal service of transportation.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031