Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mahindra World City Vs Commissioner, Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 50749 of 2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/09/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Mahindra World City (Jaipur) Ltd. Vs Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi)

CESTAT Delhi held that as per rule 4(b)(iii) of the point of Point of Taxation Rules, 2011, in case payment is received before change in effective rate of tax and invoice is issued after change in effective rate of tax, then, point of taxation will be date of payment. Hence, demand set aside on advance receipt.

Facts- The appellant, M/s Mahindra World City (Jaipur) Ltd., has entered into Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) – DTA land on 7.3.2012 to lease land to M/s JCB India Ltd. for setting up a new project for manufacture of earth moving/material handling equipment. Para 2.1 and 2.2 of the said MOU clearly provided that the lease deed shall be executed only after fiscal incentives had been provided by the Government of Rajasthan; failing which the lease deed will not be entered and the amount paid will have to be refunded to the appellant as provided in para 8.1 of MOU.

Thereafter the appellants received Rs. 10,62,33,750/- in March 2012 and the balance amount of Rs. 60,19,91,250/-was received in October, 2012. The lease deed was executed on 23.10.2012. The appellant discharged the service tax of Rs. 7,44,06,119/- and interest of Rs. 23,31,116/- on delay in payment of service tax of Rs. 1,31,31,492/- payable on Rs. 10,62,33,750/- received in March 2012 on 27.11.2012.

The Department initiated investigation and on completion, show cause notice was issued alleging that service tax was payable in March 2012 on the entire amount, and interest on the delayed payment. The show cause notice also alleged that the appellants had collected Rs. 1,45,89,436/- as excess amount. Vide the impugned order-in-original the demand of (i) Rs. 7,29,47,175/- (ii) Rs. 21,88,416/- collected in excess amount of service tax was confirmed and held to be payable under Section 73A and penalty of Rs. 10,000/- under Section 77(2) was imposed.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031