Case Law Details
L.S. Diamonds Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Introduction: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai addressed a case involving L.S. Diamonds and the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT). The issue revolved around the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for alleged inaccurate particulars of income due to estimated additions.
Analysis: In the assessment, the Assessing Officer made additions to the income of the assessee based on alleged bogus purchases. These additions were made on an estimated basis, and the CIT(A) partially confirmed the additions. Subsequently, penalties were levied by the Assessing Officer, which were upheld by the CIT(A).
However, the ITAT Mumbai, citing the precedent set by a coordinate bench in the case of Fancy Diamonds India Pvt. Ltd., ruled that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act is not applicable when additions are made on an estimated basis. The ITAT referred to decisions by the Hon’ble Rajasthan and Gujarat High Courts, stating that penalties on estimated additions are unsustainable.
Conclusion: The ITAT Mumbai’s ruling in favor of L.S. Diamonds clarifies that penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act cannot be imposed when additions are based on estimation rather than concrete evidence of concealment. This decision aligns with the legal principle that penalties should not be levied on estimated additions, providing relief to the assessee.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
