Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Thinkstations Learning Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : I.T.A No. 9824/Del/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/07/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Thinkstations Learning Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

ITAT Delhi held that rejection of Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Method for valuation of share price unjustified as that the methodology adopted was a recognized method of valuation and the Revenue was unable to show that the assessee adopted a demonstrably wrong approach.

Facts- In the course of assessment proceedings, AO noticed that assessee allotted 1,42,856 equity shares of Rs.10/- each at a premium of Rs.130/- per share. AO noticed that the assessee followed Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Method for valuation of share price. AO referring to the provisions of section 56(2)(viib) and the explanation he was of the view that assessee has to consider the valuation whichever is higher between (i) the valuation according to Rule 11UA of Income Tax Rules or (ii) the value of shares to the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer. AO was of the view that DCF method followed by the assessee for the valuation of shares is nothing but assumption for projected of cash flow and stated to be not only unjustified and un-related to the actual financial position of the assessee company but also without any rational basis.

Accordingly, AO himself has determined the fair market value of the share at Rs.5.80 Paise and accordingly an amount of Rs.1,85,71,280/- was added as income from other sources u/s. 56(2)(viib) of the Act. CIT(A) sustained the action of AO.

Conclusion- Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Cinestaan Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. held that the shares had not been subscribed to by any sister concern or closely related person but by outsider investors. It was further held that the methodology adopted was a recognized method of valuation and the Revenue was unable to show that the assessee adopted a demonstrably wrong approach or that the method of valuation was made on a wholly erroneous basis or that the method of valuation or that it committed a mistake which went to the root of the process.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031