Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Uttar Pradesh Metro Rail Corporation Limited (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. UP ADRG-22/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/04/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Uttar Pradesh Metro Rail Corporation Limited (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh)

We find that Applicant M/S Uttar Pradesh Metro Rail Corporation Limited is receiver of the Goods/Services provided by the KESCO. In light of point (a) provided under Section 95 of CGST Act 2017, only supplier of the services can file Application for Advance Ruling. In this case the supplier of service is KESCO. Also in the similar matter M/s Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited had applied for advance ruling as supplier of service and advance ruling authority has ruled on merit. Accordingly, we do not admit the application for consideration/ruling on merits as applicant does not fall under the definition of Advance Ruling.

Read AAAR Order: Only suppliers can initiate the advance ruling process not recipient: AAAR

FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, UTTAR PRADESH

1. M/S Uttar Pradesh Metro Rail Corporation Limited, Administrative Building, Near Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar Samajik Parivartan Sthal,Vipin Khand,Gomti Nagar, Lucknow Uttar Pradesh-226010 (here in after referred to as the applicant) is a registered assessee under GST having GSTN: 09AACCL5936H2Z9.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031