Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Mohd. Umar Timber Mart. (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Mohd Umar Timber Mart (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that it is settled legal position that when income is estimated, then there can be no question of imposing penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Facts- The assessee in dealer in timber and wooden items. For the A.Y. 2009-10, Assessee has filed the return of income on 18.09.2010, for the A.Y. 2010-11 the same was duly processed u/s 143(1). Subsequently, based on certain information received from sales tax department, Maharashtra, giving names and details of certain dealers, who were providing entries for bogus purchase bills, assessee’s ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930