Case Law Details
Shri Sumit Gahlot Vs ITO (ITAT Jodhpur)
The assessee has offered income on presumptive basis u/s 44AD of the Act is not required to maintain regular books of account. Ld. AO has not disputed the amount of revenue/gross receipt declared by the assessee by placing any contrary material. The details called for by the AO mainly include the sundry debtors and creditors. In this case, the assessee is not required to maintain proper books of accounts since he has opted for presumptive taxation u/s 44AD of the Act. Under these given facts and circumstances of the case, firstly we fail to find any merit in the action of Ld. AO calling for the details of sundry creditors and further making addition u/s 68 of the Act for unexplained creditors of Rs.28,964/-. Section 68 of the Act comes into operation only where any sum is found credited in the books of the assessee maintained in the previous year and the assessee offeres no explanation about the nature and source thereof or explanation offered by him, is not in the opinion of the AO satisfactory then such sum so credited may be charged to tax as income of the assessee. Since the assessee is admittedly not required to maintain the books of account, therefore, there is no basis for invoking the provision of section 68 of the Act. Thus we delete the addition of Rs.28,964/-made for unexplained sundry creditors.
ITAT held that provision of Section 68 cannot be invoked as the assessee was not required to maintain the books of account. Since Section 115BBE comes into operation only in case of income referred in Section 68/69/69A/69B/69C and 69D of the Act which is not applicable on the issues raised in the instant case, therefore, there is no justification for invoking the provisions of Section 115BE of the Act.
No Section 80C deduction if Assessee fail to submit proof
As regards the denial of deduction u/s 80C of the Act for life insurance premium payment, we find that assessee failed to file any proof before the lower authorities and before us for payment of LIC premium and in absence thereof such claim cannot be allowed. We thus confirm the findings of the ld CIT(A) not allowing the claim of the assessee u/s 80C of the Act.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Is the orders from ITAT can be considered as reference for such other cases ?.