Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjay Raghunath Agarwal Vs Directorate of Enforcement (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Criminal Appeal No. 1198 of 2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/04/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sanjay Raghunath Agarwal Vs Directorate of Enforcement (Supreme Court of India)

1. Leave granted.

2. Heard Shri R. Basant, senior counsel and Shri S.V. Raju, learned Additional Solicitor General for the parties.

3. A criminal complaint in FIR No.664/2013 was registered on 29.10.2013 with the Cyberabad Police, against six persons, including the appellant herein for alleged offences under Sections 406, 407, 415 to 420, 120B read with Section 34 IPC. The FIR was registered on the basis of a complaint lodged by one M. Srinivas Reddy, who was the Managing Director of a Company by name M/s Farmax India Limited1. The gist of the complaint was, that Farmax availed the services of the accused in raising Global Depository Receipts (GDRs), to the tune of USD 71.09 millions equivalent to INR 318 crores; that though the accused raised the said amount, they transferred to Farmax only a sum of USD 0.4 millions equivalent to INR 2.20 crores; and that upon enquiry with the bank, the complainant company came to know that the accused has misappropriated the balance amount by forging the signatures, with the help of the pledged documents.

4. It is relevant to note here that the aforesaid FIR was registered, pursuant to an Order passed by the VI Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Medchal, Rangareddy District, under Section156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduadte from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Disallowance of agricultural expenses on estimation is not sustainable Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e) cannot be assessed by way of double deeming Initiation of Section 271D/271E penalty must arise out of assessment proceedings Adhoc expense disallowance without rejecting books of accounts not justified Is Sumptuary Allowance to Judicial Officers Exempt from Income Tax? View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031