Case Law Details
Diwakar Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST and anr. (Punjab and Haryana HC)
If tax is collected without any authority of law, the same would amount to depriving person of his property without any authority of law and would infringe his right under Article 300A of Constitution. The only provision which permits deposit of amount during pendency of investigation is Section 74 (5) of Act, which is not attracted. The amount collected from company is in violation of Article 265 and 300A of Constitution. The contention of the department that amount under deposit be made subject to outcome of pending investigation, cannot be accepted.
In the present case, as per the department, the petitioner has deposited the impugned amount voluntarily and the proper procedure has been followed. But Article 265 of the Constitution of India lays down that collection of tax has to be by the authority of law. If tax is collected without any authority of law, the same would amount to depriving a person of his property without any authority of law and would infringe his right under Article 300 A of the Constitution of India as well. In the present case, no receipt was given by the Proper Officer after accepting the impugned amount. Thus, the amount deposited by the petitioner under protest were liable to be refunded in view of the above mentioned judgments, as the petitioner has been deprived of his right.
In view of the above, the writ petition is partly allowed and respondent No. 1 is directed to refund a sum of Rs.1,99,90,000/- along with 6 % interest.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
