Case Law Details
Case Name : Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Vs Royal Enfield (Unit of M/s.Eicher Motors Ltd.) (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Chennai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Vs Royal Enfield (Unit of M/s.Eicher Motors Ltd.) (CESTAT Chennai)
CESTAT Chennai held that unjust enrichment is not applicable to refund consequent upon finalization of provisional assessment under Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Facts- Provisional assessment of the respondent was finalized with demand of Rs. 28,09,480/-. During remand proceedings of the same, the adjudicating authority issued show cause notice dt. 07.10.2008 with corrigendum dt. 20.10.2008 proposing to demand Rs.3,14,69,952/- (Rs.47,18,567/- towards packing charges and Rs.2,67,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

