Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Vs Royal Enfield (Unit of M/s.Eicher Motors Ltd.) (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Vs Royal Enfield (Unit of M/s.Eicher Motors Ltd.) (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that unjust enrichment is not applicable to refund consequent upon finalization of provisional assessment under Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944. Facts- Provisional assessment of the respondent was finalized with demand of Rs. 28,09,480/-. During remand proceedings of the same, the adjudicating authority issued show cause notice dt. 07.10.2008 with corrigendum dt. 20.10.2008 proposing to demand Rs.3,14,69,952/- (Rs.47,18,567/- towards packing charges and Rs.2,67,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930