Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not leviable as disallowance of expense doesn’t mean incorrect furnishing of income

Case Law Details

Case Name
Kekri Cooperative Marketing Society Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2013-14
Advertisement Kekri Cooperative Marketing Society Vs ITO ( ITAT Jaipur) ITAT Jaipur held that disallowance of expenses per se cannot mean that the assessee has furnished incorrect particulars of income. Accordingly, penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act not leviable. Facts- The assessee claimed deduction under various sub-section of 80P of the Act. However, the AO after verification of the records restricted the allowance of deduction u/s 80P of the Act and he was of the view that the business activities carried out by the assessee are not falling under the category of eligi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *