Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kantar IMRB Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Mumbai Central (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kantar IMRB Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Mumbai Central (CESTAT Mumbai) Appellant had paid rent on halls hired in the hotels where the halls were hired for interviews with the respondents and all the expenses were reimbursed by their clients on actual basis. He further stated that for conducting market research, employees have to travel and stay in hotels and such hotel stay expenses are essential part of activity for output services and therefore, service tax paid on hotel stay expenses were availed by them as CENVAT Credit. Further, he stated that both the said activities are...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930