Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Motiprabha Infratech Pvt. Ltd Vs Union of India (Patna High Court)
Appeal Number : Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16751 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/12/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Motiprabha Infratech Pvt. Ltd Vs Union of India (Patna High Court)

Undisputedly, minimum statutory period of 30 days mandated under the provisions of Section 74(A) of CGST/BGST Act, 2017 was not afforded to the petitioner for making payment due and prior to the expiry of 30 days, the assessing officer proceeded to pass the order, ex parte in nature. The notice dated 15.02.2021 (Annexure-P/4 series) directed the petitioner to file reply on 21st of February, 2021 which was within the period of 30 days. It is the mandate of law that 30 days’ period has to be afforded to the parties, which was not done in the instant case.

As such, on this ground alone, we quash the notice dated 15.02.2021 (Annexure-P/4 series) as also the order of assessment dated 24.02.2021 (Annexure-P/1 ) with the direction to the assessing officer to issue a fresh notice in the light of the statutory provisions and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. All proceedings be positively complied with in these matters.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF PATNA HIGH COURT

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031