Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Additional evidence cannot be rejected for mere non-conformity with Rule 46A

Case Law Details

Case Name
Nirmala Subramanian Vs CIT (A) (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2007-08
Advertisement Nirmala Subramanian Vs CIT (A) (ITAT Mumbai) The short question in this appeal is whether the assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 54 of the Act or not and what is the date of acquisition of new residential house for the purpose of deduction under Section 54 of the Act. Provision of Section 54 shows that whether any individual or a HUF invest, the capital gain arise on transfer of residential house within a period of 1 year before or two years after the date of transfer of the house property then the amount of capital gain invested in purchase of new house property,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *