This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Order unsustainable as passed without considering relevant evidence
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Seven Hills Constructions Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Seven Hills Constructions Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
CESTAT Mumbai held that order passed without considering evidence relating to availment of depreciation under the Income Tax Act is liable to be quashed.
Facts-
In this appeal, M/s Seven Hills Constructions impugns three separate recoveries under authority of rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for being credit held as ineligible on two separate counts even as availment of depreciation under Income Tax Act, 1961 was assailed as breach in common.
The appellant is a provider of ‘mining services’ that was legislated ...
Author Info
