Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Kansur Developers India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 1441 & 1442/Bang/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/10/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ACIT Vs Kansur Developers India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore)

ITAT Bangalore held that provisions of section 68 of the Income Tax Act are not applicable to the remittance made in India by non-resident.

Facts-

Revenue has preferred the present appeal on the ground that CIT(A) erred in deleting ‘Addition u/ s 68 of the Income Tax Act,1961 amounting to Rs.4,07,88,170/ – without appreciating the fact that except for the identity, the assessee has not been able to establish the creditworthiness of the person advancing the loan and also the genuineness of the transaction.

Revenue has also raised the ground that CIT(A) erred in not appreciating that the said investor Shri Samyakant C Veera has invested of about 53.34 million US $ whereas his net income over a period of 6 proceedings years in US was only 3.3 million US$ as revealed from his tax returns filed with US Revenue authorities and hence his creditworthiness has not been proved.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031