Case Law Details
DCIT Vs AC Nielsen Corporation (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that consultancy services not of technical nature cannot treated as Fees for Included Services as per sub-clause 4B of Article 12 of DTAA between India –USA and hence addition unsustainable.
Facts-
The assessee is a company established under the laws of Delaware USA and has registered office in New York. AC Nielsen Group is one of the leading business and information companies in the world and is represented in India through two legal entities namely ACNielsen Org Marg Pvt. Ltd.(in brevity ACNOM) for customized research services and retail measurement services ACNielsen Research Services Pvt. Ltd. (in brevity ACNRS) for rendering services in the field of commercial, financial, accounting and legal, logistics etc. In the year of appeal a sum of Rs. 15,06,52,986/- was received from Indian entities for the services which was claimed exempted under Article 12 of India-USA DTAA.
In the original assessment order, AO taxed entire income, 50% as royalty and 50% as fees for included services (FIS). It was upheld by CIT(A). However, matter has been sent back to the file of AO for fresh adjudication by Hon’ble order of ITAT vide order dated 02.03.2016. The AO has passed order as per the direction of the ITAT on 14.02.2018, taxing entire amount of Rs. 15,06,52,986/- as fees for included services (FIS). The assessee has filed appeal against the order of the ld. AO before the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) after considering the order of the ITAT Jurisdictional Bench and the submission of the assessee, accepted the assessee’s claim and dismissed the addition made by the ld. AO. Being aggrieved, the revenue filed appeal before us.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
