Case Law Details
Balaji Auto Enterprises Mysore Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
ITAT observe from the order of the AO that the assessee has received cash more than 2.00/- Lakh from the four parties on different dates. As per the opinion of the AO the assessee has violated the provision of section 269ST, therefore, he imposed the penalty u/s 271DA of the Act. On going through the copy of the ledger, it has been observed that the assessee has not received cash more than Rs. 2.00/- Lakh in a day from one party.
After going through section 269ST, it is clear that the assessee’s case does not fall under this section. Hence, penalty cannot be levied. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT BANGALORE
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of CIT(A)-2, Panaji dated 04.05.2022 for the assessment year 201819 for penalty imposed u/s 271DA of the Act with the following grounds of appeal:-
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
