Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dabur India Limited Vs CIT (TDS) (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dabur India Limited Vs CIT (TDS) (Delhi High Court) 20% of disputed tax demand is not a pre-requisite for putting in abeyance recovery of demand pending first appeal in all cases Writ petition were filed challenging the order  dismissing the Petitioner’s application for stay of demand and directing the Petitioner to pay 20% of the total outstanding demand. The Delhi High Court held that  the requirement of payment of 20% of disputed tax demand is not a pre-requisite for putting in abeyance recovery of demand pending first appeal in all cases. The said pre-condition of deposit of 20% of the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031