Case Law Details
Kamla Devi Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
In the present case, from the orders of the authorities below, it is clear that the authorities below have treated interest received by the assessee on enhanced compensation u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1984 as ‘Income from other sources’ and denied exemption u/s 10(37) of the Act. The facts and circumstances of the present case are identical and similar to the case of Ram Kishan (supra) wherein the coordinate Bench of the Tribunal categorically held that the interest received by the assessee u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1984 on enhanced compensation is part and parcel of the compensation, if the agricultural land of the assessee has been acquired under compulsory acquisition and, thus, the same is exempt income u/s 10(37) of the Act.
FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT DELHI
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 29.04.2022 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) for Assessment Year 2012-13.
2. The grounds raised by the assessee read as under:-
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.