Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Metal Gems Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 12432 of 2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/10/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Metal Gems Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

CESTAT Ahmedabad held that allegation of clandestine removals based upon the confessional statement of other persons or the documents recovered from the third party premises, without corroboration of the said documents is unsustainable

Facts-

M/s Metal Gems are engaged in the manufacture of Copper and Copper Alloy articles. On the basis of an intelligence that M/s Metal Gems are clearing the goods i.e. Copper wire/ Rod/ Pipe/tube without cover of the Central Excise invoices, without payment of Central Excise Duty and without accounting for the same, in their books of account, searches were conducted by the officers of DGCEI at the premises of M/s Metal Gems and M/s Moongipa Roadways Pvt. Ltd. and also seized several records and documents.

The documents recovered from M/s Moongipa Roadways Pvt. Ltd. were scrutinized and it appeared that they are engaged in the transportation of the consignment of Copper Pipes/ tubes/ coils from M/s Metal Gems, Daman. They have been showing the name of /details of the consignor and consignee when the goods are covered under proper central excise invoices and whenever the goods are not covered under proper invoices, they have been showing the consignment to have been booked in abbreviated form such as NKD, RKD, SMD, MKD, Lalitbhai, PD, KK, AE, etc. they have admitted that the consignment which have been transported by them under the abbreviated names have been received by them, for transportation, without the cover of any proper duty paying documents. They also admitted that persons of M/s Metal Gems have also been in continuous touch with the persons of the transporter for the purpose of transportation of their goods. On the basis of the investigation carried out at the transporters end and as per the statements of the persons/ directors of M/s Moongipa Roadways Pvt. Ltd., the investigation was extended to buyers of the goods, which were transported by M/s Moongipa Roadways Pvt. Ltd. by showing the names of the consignors/ consignees in abbreviated form and as self. The revenue calculated the duty demand on the basis of records/ register of transporter.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031