Case Law Details
CIT, Udaipur Vs Udaipur Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Limited (Rajasthan High Court)
While completing the assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the Assessing Officer (AO) noticed that the assessee had deposited payment of Rs.14,60,412/- in the PF fund and Rs.973/- in the ESI fund with delay that is the said payments were deposited after the due dates i.e. after 15th next month and, therefore, added the said amount to the income of the assessee as per the provisions of Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x) of the Act.
Aggrieved by the assessment order dated 26.12.2008, the assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A), who, vide its appellate order dated 15.03.2010 after noticing certain judgments came to the conclusion that it is a settled position of law that where payments on account of contribution to the PF, ESI etc. are made within the due date of filing the return, such deductions are allowable. It was further noticed that it was not in dispute that the PF contribution and ESI was deposited by the appellant before the due date of filing the return and, consequently, the CIT(A) deleted the dis-allowance made by the AO and granted a relief of Rs.14,61,385/-.
ITAT by its order dated 16.12.2011 upheld the order passed by the CIT(A) on the said issue, inter alia, holding that the employees’ contribution is allowable, if the same is paid before the due date of return.
Hon’ble Supreme Court in Vinay Cement (supra), the Delhi High Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. AIMIL Ltd : (2010) 321 ITR 508 (Delhi) held at page 518 as under:-
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.