Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Emami Agrotech Ltd. Vs The State of West Bengal (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : WPA 4916 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/09/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Emami Agrotech Ltd. Vs The State of West Bengal (Calcutta High Court)

The petitioner is before the Court against an order dated 20.12.2021 passed by the Secretary, Department of Industry, Commerce and Enterprises, Government of West Bengal. The order was passed in compliance with the directions of the Court in earlier writ petition which related to the petitioner’s claim for disbursal of incentive under “West Bengal State Support for Industries Scheme, 2008 as amended up to 2010. The Scheme relates to Industrial Promotion Assistance to industrial units falling under two groups and in the scales mentioned in Clause 10.1 of the Scheme. The incentive, in similar clause, is for refund of a percentage of VAT paid by the industrial units. The petitioner claims to fall under group-B and Scale-2 of Clause 10.1. The Scheme was notified on 22nd February, 2011 and under Clause 19 provides for application of the Scheme mutatis mutandis in the event the Scheme is replaced by any other Act.

The GST regime came into force on 1st July, 2017. The petitioner prays for making the Scheme compliant with the GST regime which subsequently came into effect.

The Report filed by the respondent No. 4 being the Department of Industry, Commerce and Enterprises, states that in the absence of the definite policy regarding adjustment of the Scheme with the changed taxation regime, grant of RC-II is not feasible. The grant of RC-II was a step in the direction of securing the incentive under the later Scheme notified on 12th September, 2014 but having same scope of an application under the Scheme of 2008. The petitioner claims to fulfill the relevant criteria for grant of incentive under both the Schemes. The petitioner also prays for the required inspection to be undertaken by the State respondents before grant of RC-II.

The stand of the respondent No. 4, being the Department of Industry, Commerce and Enterprises is not comprehensible to the Court since reluctance is based on the change of tax regime from VAT to GST. The position taken is unreasonable since Clause 19 of the 2008 Scheme, as stated above clearly contemplates subsequent changes in the law and provides for the Scheme to apply irrespective of such changes. The similar Clause was also inserted in the later Scheme of 2014, being Clause 15.2.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031