This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Compliance of Pre-Deposit Under Section 43(5) of RERA Act is Mandatory
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Air Force Naval Housing Board Air Force Station Vs U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority And Another (Allahabad High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Allahabad High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Air Force Naval Housing Board Air Force Station Vs U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority And Another (Allahabad High Court)
The word ‘promoter’ has been deliberately used by the legislature in the proviso to sub-section (5) of Section 43, as subsection (5) provides a remedy of statutory appeal to any person aggrieved by the direction or decision of an authority to file appeal before the Tribunal, but in case of a ‘promoter’ the mandatory deposit has to be made prior to the entertainment of the appeal by the Tribunal.
The purpose of insertion of such provision is to s...






