Case Law Details
Shivaco Associates & Anr. Vs Joint Commissioner of State Tax, (Calcutta High Court)
The petitioners claim refund in accordance with Section 54(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 on the ground that credit has accumulated on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on output supplies. Admittedly, the rate of tax on the input supply (LPG in bulk) is 18% and the rate of tax on output supply (LPG in small Containers for domestic consumers) is 5%.
The claim of the petitioners for refund stood rejected on the ground that the input and output supplies are the same. The said restriction on claiming refund has been imposed by the circular dated 31.03.2020. The said circular was issued in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 168(1) of the CGST Act, 2017.
According to Section 168(1) of the Act the Board may, if it considers it necessary or expedient so to do for the purpose of uniformity in the implementation of the Act, issue such orders, instructions or directions to the central tax officers as it may deem fit, and thereupon all such officers and all other persons employed in the implementation of the Act shall observe and follow such orders, instructions or directions.
According to the petitioners, the gas which is purchased in bulk is not supplied to the consumers in the same manner and quantity, but bulk gas is refilled in small containers and thereafter sold out to both commercial as well as domestic consumers. Hence, it cannot be said that the input and output supplies remain the same.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
