Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mutharamman Iron and Steels Vs The Principal Additional Director General (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No. 11 of 2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/04/2021
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Mutharamman Iron and Steels Vs The Principal Additional Director General (Madras High Court)

This writ petition has been filed challenging the provisional attachment of bank account of the petitioner pending proceedings for investigation.

2. I had, when the matter has come up for admission on 07.01.2021, stated at paragraph-3 as follows:

‘3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the since all the bank accounts of the petitioner have been attached, the petitioners’ business has been entirely crippled. It would suffice that some bank accounts, sufficient to protect the interest of the revenue, remain under attachment, whereas the remaining may be released to enable conduct of business. Let the petitioner appear before the respondent with its request in this regard and orders be passed within a week from date of its appearance.’

HC lifts provisional attachment of bank account as petitioner made adhoc GST payments pending investigation

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031