Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Aadhya Gold Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 35/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/07/2021
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Aadhya Gold Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka)

Whether GST is to be paid only on the difference between the selling price and purchase price as stipulated under Rule 32(5) of CGST Rules, 2017, if applicant purchases used/second hand gold jewellery from individuals who are not dealers under the GST and at the time of sale there is no change in the form/nature of goods?

In the case of applicant dealing in second hand goods and invoicing his supplies as “second hand goods”, the valuation of supply of second hand gold jewellery which are purchased from individuals who are not registered under GST and there is no change in the form and nature of such goods, can be made as prescribed under sub-rule (5) of rule 32 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules.

Sub-rule (5) of rule 32 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules is as follows:-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031