Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Full Unconditional Stay of Demand Granted Where Addition on Third Party Statement was Without Cross Examination

Case Law Details

Case Name
Dilipkumar P. Chheda Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2012-13
Advertisement Dilipkumar P. Chheda Vs ITO (Bombay High Court) In so far the present case is concerned, here also the additions have been made primarily on the basis of the statement made by Shri. Nilesh Bharani and also on the basis of certain entries in the telephone diary. However, we find from the materials on record that though summons was issued to Shri. Nilesh Bharani for cross-examination by the petitioner, Shri. Nilesh Bharani did not appear on the date fixed and therefore he could not be cross-examined. Thus, we are prima-facie of the view that reliance placed on such uncorroborate...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

KAPIL GOEL (FCA,LLB) / SANDEEP GOEL (LLB)
Qualification: LL.B / Advocate
Company: KAPIL GOEL
Location: NORTH DELHI, Delhi
Articles Published: 177

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *