This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Addition on matters not related to reasons recorded for reassessment based on fishing enquiry not valid
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Anil K. Shah (Huf) Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2009-2010
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Anil K. Shah (Huf) Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
In the case of Ranbaxy Laboratory Ltd. vs. CIT (supra), the Hon’ble High Court has explained the effect of Explanation 3 to section 147 inserted by Finance Act, 2009 which empowers the AO to assess the any income which comes to his notice subsequently even though no reasons have been recorded in respect thereof holding that Explanation 3 does not empower the AO to make roving enquiries in respect of other matters. Since, the Ld. CIT (A) has held in principle that the AO has made fishing enquiry in the course of reassessment proceedings...
