Follow Us :

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjiv Kumar Mittal Vs Deputy Commissioner (TRC), CGST Commissionerate Delhi South & Ors. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. (C) 5590/2020 & CM Appl. 20200/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/11/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Member to Download

Sanjiv Kumar Mittal Vs Deputy Commissioner (TRC), CGST Commissionerate Delhi South & Ors. (Delhi High Court)

SECTION 87(b)(i) OF THE FINANCE ACT PROVIDES FOR A  GARNISHEE ORDER ONLY – i.e. PROVIDES FOR ATTACHMENT OF FUNDS OF AN ASSESSEE LYING WITH THIRD PARTIES. THERE IS NO PROVISION IN THE FINANCE ACT MAKING AN EX-DIRECTOR, EVEN IF HAVING KNOWLEDGE OF AFFAIRS OF THE COMPANY,  VICARIOUSLY OR JOINTLY LIABLE FOR THE DUES OF THE COMPANY

Though Section 174(2) of CGST Act saves any duty or tax that is due or may become due under the repealed Act including Chapter V of the Finance Act, yet there is no provision in the Finance Act making the Directors personally liable for service tax liabilities of a company.

It is clarified that Section 89 of the current CGST Act is confined only to liabilities assessed under the CGST Act and cannot be used to fasten personal liability on Directors for company dues determined under the Finance Act. After all, no new liability can be fastened under the CGST Act for a period prior to its enactment as it does not have retrospective operation.

Section 87(b)(i) not makes directors of Company, Vicariously or Jointly Liable for Dues of Company

Please become a member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031