Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Boxster Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and ors. (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number :  Writ Petition No. 5669 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/09/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Boxster Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and ors. (Bombay High Court)

The issue under consideration is whether freezing the bank account for such a long period is justified in law?

High Court states that as per the proviso the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs can extend such provisional attachment for a further period not exceeding six months; but he must record reasons for such extension and such extension of period has to be informed to the person whose bank account is provisionally attached before expiry of the period so specified. Thus from a careful reading of sub-section (5) of Section 110 it is noticeable that several pre-conditions and procedures are mandated. It may not be necessary for an elaborate deliberation of the same in view of the fact that respondents in their affidavit have not placed on record any order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs under sub-section (5) of Section 110. Suffice it to say that an order in writing for provisional attachment of a bank account is a must before such an account can be attached. In the absence of such an order in writing respondents could not have provisionally attached the bank account of the petitioner and continued with such attachment even beyond the permissible extended period. Learned counsel for the respondents could not show any other provision in the Customs Act which empowers or authorizes the customs department to freeze the bank account of a person other than sub-section (5) of Section 110. Such attachment of bank account of the petitioner on 1st March, 2019 and its continuation thereafter being in breach of Section 110(5) is therefore, without any authority of law. Thus, having regard to the discussions made above, respondents are directed to unfreeze the bank account of the petitioner.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT

This order will dispose of the above noted three writ petitions.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031