Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Girdhari Lal Lath Vs.State of Maharashtra & Ors. (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition (L) No.988 Of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/09/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Girdhari Lal Lath Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (Bombay High Court)

Since Sub Section (6) of Section 44 of the MVAT Act is subject to the Companies Act, 2013 the definitions and distinctions laid down in the Companies Act, 2013 vis-a-vis public company and private company would be applicable to Section 44(6) of the MVAT Act as if by way of incorporation.

It is an admitted position, at least no dispute has been raised, that M/s. Birla Electricals Limited is a public company. If that be so, the fact that Petitioner was a director of the said company for the relevant period, though in a non-executive character and stated to have resigned, would have no bearing on fastening of liability on the Petitioner for the alleged default of M/s. Birla Electricals Limited. In such circumstances, attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner does not appear to be justified and is without any legal sanction.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT

1. Heard Mr. Bharat Raichandani, learned counsel for the Petitioner ; Ms. Jyoti Chavan, learned AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 ; and Ms. Suvarna Joshi, learned counsel for Respondent Nos.5 & 6.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031