Case Law Details
DCIT Vs Jugal Kishore Garg (Derewala) (ITAT Jaipur)
The ld. CIT(A) observed that it is evident that the surplus being referred to by the Ld. AO is not profit from the projects but the receipts of ‘on money’ credited to the capital accounts of the partners which has been considered in the additional income offered by MBDL and accepted by the Hon’ble Settlement Commission.
Thus on merits also since the amounts had already been added by the AO and the same had already been subjected to tax in the hands of MBDL and related entities, therefore, the ld. CIT(A) after considering all those facts had correctly deleted the addition made in various assessment years. The Bench also noted that no new facts have been brought by the Revenue in controverting the order of the ld. CIT(A) to the issue in question. In this view, of the matter, we find no reason to interfere with the order of the ld. CIT(A). Thus the appeal of the Revenue for the assessment year 2014-15 is dismissed.
As regards the appeals of the Revenue for the assessment year 2015-16 to 2017-18, the Bench noted that the grounds raised by the Revenue are similar and the facts are also similar to the case of the Revenue for the assessment year 2014-15 wherein the appeal of the Revenue for the assessment year 2014-15 is dismissed, hence taking into consideration the similar facts and circumstances of the case, the decision taken by the Bench for the assessment year 2014-15 shall be applicable mutatis mutandis in the appeals of the Revenue for the assessment year 2015-16 to 2017-18. Thus the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed.
FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
