Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Shri pardeep Singh Hooda (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Time gap between withdrawal of cash & spending of cash not relevant unless it is proved that assessee spent the amount somewhere else. Addition of minimum guarantee cannot be made if the same has been taken in business gross receipts. Only assesss’s share in the property is to be considered for the investment made in the property. Past history of GP ratio and NP ratio is to be considered if the books of accounts are not found reliable. If LIP payment is made through cheque then it cannot be considered as unexplained investment. If opportunity of being heard is not given to the assess...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930