Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Block Development Officer Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : Financial Years :2015-16 & 2016-17 (24Q & 26Q, 2nd, 3rd & 4th Quarter)
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Block Development Officer Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur) The issue under consideration is whether the late filing fees for TDS return u/s 234E is mandatory in nature or it can be condone if there is reasonable cause? ITAT states that the levy of late fee as prescribed U/s 234E of the Act is mandatory and consequential, therefore, the same cannot be deleted on the ground of reasonable cause as explained by the assessee. It is pertinent to mention that though the intimation issued U/s 200A of the Act is an appealable order, however, the said order can be challenged only on the ground that the adjustment ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930