Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shahzad Alam Vs State of U.P. and Another (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Criminal Misc Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No. 3458 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/06/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shahzad Alam Vs State of U.P. and Another (Allahabad High Court)

In the present case, the applicant is requesting bail against the case raised under sections 420, 424, 467, 468, 120B IPC and section 122/132 U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 for allegation of tax evasion under GST Act.The applicant was doing business of generator in one rented house.There is an allegations against him that he has evade the tax under GST Act. There is no criminal history against the accused-applicant.

High Court state that, taking into consideration the gravity of accusation, there being no criminal antecedents of the applicant and there being no possibility of his fleeing from justice, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT

Heard Sri Vidya Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, and Sri Rishi Chaddha, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031