Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Rahul Pancholi (ITAT Jaipur)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 949/JP/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/09/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief of the case:

AO find decline in gross profit rate in current year in comparison to previous year. On examination of books of account AO found discrepancies in accounts. He made additions after rejecting books of account u/s 145 (3). Assessee filed appeal before CIT (A) who allowed appeal of the assessee by holding that mere difference in rate of gross profit would amount to rejection of books of account and deleted the additions. Aggrived from the order revenue filed appeal before ITAT. After going through the facts of the case ITAT remanded the matter back to AO for further verification.

Facts of the case:

  • Assessee deals in purchase and sale of Till. Assessee filed his return at Rs. 57,33,650/-. The AO observed that the assessee had not enclosed the audit report prescribed u/s 44AB of the Act. The assessee has submitted in the return that the case is not auditable.
  • Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031