Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Devendraa P. Kapur Vs ICAI & Others (Appellate Authority of ICAI)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. 02/ICAI/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/02/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Devendraa P. Kapur Vs ICAI & Others (Appellate Authority of ICAI)

1. We have been informed by the Registrar of the Authority that Shri J. Venkateswarlu, one of the members of the Appellate Authority is not available for hearing the application for extension of time to dispose of these matters by Institute of Chartered Accountants of India on his being busy elsewhere today.

2. This order shall dispose of an application dated 17th January, 2020 filed by Respondent 1/Applicant Institute seeking extension of time by 6 months to conclude the proceedings in the above case pending before it. The application is contested by the non-applicant/Appellant.

3. We have heard the Learned Counsel for the parties and have examined the file.

4. It is a matter of record that vide order dated 01.11.2018, this Authority had remanded these appeals and the Disciplinary Committee (DC) was directed to dispose of the cases within 6 months from the receipt of the order. The outer limit for disposal of the matter pending before Disciplinary Committee expired on 01.05.2019. The DC did not proceed with the matter; no extension was sought from the Appellate Authority. The DC issued notice to the non-applicant after the expiry of the period of 6 months on 08.07.2019. Learned Counsel for the non-applicant urged that the proceedings initiated by the DC are in violation of the direction of this Authority. DC was grossly negligent in not complying with the directions. The non-applicant had moved an application before the DC raising preliminary legal objection, but it was not taken note of. The non-applicant was not given reasonable opportunity of being heard and in a hurry, the DC passed an order holding the non-applicant ‘guilty’. The said order is non-est in law and DC had no jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031