Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

Amitav Ganguly

Formulation Of Policy On Remuneration Of Directors, Key Managerial Personnel (KMP) and Other Employees By A Company

BACKGROUND

As a good corporate governance measure the new Companies Act 2013 and the listing agreement have provided elaborately for a company to formulate a Policy of remuneration of its Directors, KMP and other employees. The relevant provisions shall have to be kept in view as well as each company shall have the flexibility to lay down its criteria as best suited to it and the business environment in which it functions.        

BRIEF OVERVIEW UNDER COMPANIES ACT 2013

{Section 178 & Companies [Meetings of Board and its Powers] Rules 2014}

  • Constituting the Nomination and Remuneration Committee consisting of three or more non-executive directors out of which not less than one-half shall be independent directors
  • The Nomination and Remuneration Committee shall identify persons who are qualified to become directors and who may be appointed in senior management in accordance with the criteria laid down, recommend to the Board their appointment and removal and shall carry out evaluation of every director’s performance.
  • The Nomination and Remuneration Committee shall formulate the criteria for determining qualifications, positive attributes and independence of a director and recommend to the Board a policy, relating to the remuneration for the directors, key managerial personnel and other employees.
  • The Nomination and Remuneration Committee shall, while formulating the policy ensure that:—
    • the level and composition of remuneration is reasonable and sufficient to attract, retain and motivate directors of the quality required to run the company successfully;
    • relationship of remuneration to performance is clear and meets appropriate performance benchmarks; and
    • remuneration to directors, key managerial personnel and senior management involves a balance between fixed and incentive pay reflecting short and long-term performance objectives appropriate to the working of the company and its goals.
  • Such policy shall be disclosed in the Board’s report.

BRIEF OVERVIEW UNDER CLAUSE 49 OF LISTING AGREEMENT

Nomination and Remuneration Committee

A. The company shall set up a nomination and remuneration committee which shall comprise at least three directors, all of whom shall be non-executive directors and at least half shall be independen Chairman of the committee shall be an independent director.

B. The role of the committee shall, inter-alia, include the following:

  • Formulation of the criteria for determining qualifications, positive attributes and independence of a director and recommend to the Board a policy, relating to the remuneration of the directors, key managerial personnel and other employees;
  • Formulation of criteria for evaluation of Independent Directors and the Board;
  • Devising a policy on Board diversity;
  • Identifying persons who are qualified to become directors and who may be appointed in senior management in accordance with the criteria laid down, and recommend to the Board their appointment and removal. The company shall disclose the remuneration policy and the evaluation criteria in its Annual Report.

MODEL TERMS OF REFERENCE OF NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE

  • Formulate the criteria for determining qualifications, positive attributes and independence of a director and recommend to the Board a policy, relating to the remuneration for the directors, key managerial personnel and other employees.
  • Identify persons who are qualified to become directors and who may be appointed in senior management in accordance with the criteria laid down, and recommend to the Board their appointment and remova
  • Removal should be strictly in terms of the applicable law/s and in compliance of principles of natural justice.
  • Formulation of criteria and carry out evaluation of Directors and the Boa
  • Devising a policy on Board diversit
  • Recommend to the Board, remuneration including salary, perquisite and commission to be paid to the company’s Managing Director & Whole Time Directors on an annual basis as well on their re-appointment, wherever applicable.
  • Recommend to the Board, the Sitting Fee (including any change) payable to the Non-Executive Directors for attending the meetings of the Board / Committee thereof, and, any other benefits such as Commission, if any, payable to the Non- Executive Directors.
  • Setting the overall Remuneration Policy and other terms of employment of Directors, wherever required.
  • The company shall disclose the Remuneration Policy and the evaluation criteria in its Annual Report

MODEL CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING THE FOLLOWING:-

Qualifications for appointment of Directors {including Independent Directors}:-

  • No specific qualification/s for Directors
  • Persons of eminence, standing and knowledge with significant achievements in business, professions and/or public service.
  • Their financial or business literacy/skills.
  • Their relevant industry experience.
  • Appropriate other qualification/experience to meet the objectives of the company.
  • Applicable provisions of Companies Act 2013, its Rules and Clause 49 of Listing Agreement.

The above qualifications, {other than the statutory requirements which are mandatory}, are preferable and desirable with absolute discretion to the Nomination and Remuneration Committee to consider and keep in view any other criteria or norms for selection of the most suitable candidate/s.      

Positive attributes of Directors {including Independent Directors}:-

  • Directors are to demonstrate integrity, credibility, trustworthiness, ability to handle conflict constructively, and the willingness to address issues proactively.
  • They are to actively refresh their knowledge and skill with the latest developments in the real estate industry, market conditions and applicable legal provisions.
  • They are to show willingness to devote sufficient time and attention for the Company and its business and execute their responsibilities
  • They are to assist in bringing independent judgments to bear on the Board’s deliberations especially on issues of strategy, performance, risk management, resources, key appointments and standards of conduct.
  • They are able to develop a good working relationship with other Board members and contribute to the Board’s working relationship with the senior management of the Company.
  • They are to act within their authority, assist in protecting the legitimate interests of the Company, its shareholders and employees

Conditions of Independence of Directors:-

Criteria for appointment in Senior Management including KMP:-

  • Their required qualifications, experience, skills & expertise to effectively meet their areas of work, duties and responsibilities.
  • Their relevant industry experience.
  • Their ability to assume the responsibilities and duties of their posts effectually.
  • Appropriate other qualification/experience to meet the objectives of the company.

 MODEL POLICY RELATING TO REMUNERATION OF DIRECTORS, KMP & OTHER EMPLOYEES {ON APPOINTMENT/ SUBSEQUENT INCREASES}:-

  • The company shall ensure that the level and composition of remuneration is reasonable and sufficient to attract, retain and motivate Directors, KMP and other employees of the quality required to run the company successfully.
  • It should be ensured that no director/KMP/ other employee are involved in deciding his or her own remuneration.
  • The market rates/ quantum and structures of remuneration as applicable to the comparable organisations in the similar business spheres should be given due consideration.
  • It is to be ensured that relationship of remuneration to the performance is clear & meets appropriate performance benchmarks.
  • Performance benchmarks are laid down.
  • Increase in remuneration should provide rewards for improved performance.
  • Remuneration packages should strike a balance between fixed and incentive pay, where applicable, reflecting short and long term performance objectives appropriate to the company’s working and goals.
  • Following criteria are also to be considered:-
    • Responsibilities and duties ;
    • Time & efforts devoted;
    • Value addition;
    • Profitability of the Company & growth of its business;
    • Analyzing each and every position and skills for fixing the remuneration yardstick ;
    • Standards for certain functions/Departments like Sanctions, Land, & Business Development, where there is a huge scarcity of qualified resources.
    • Ensuring text efficient remuneration
    • Ensuring that remuneration structure is simple and that the cost to the company {CTC} is not shown inflated and, in comparison, the effective take home remuneration is not low.
    • Any other criteria as may be applicable.
  • Consistent treatment of remuneration parameters across the organisation.
  • Provisions of law with regard making payment of remuneration, as may be applicable, are complied.
  • Whenever, there is any deviation from the Policy, the justification /reasons should also be indicated / disclosed adequately.

NEED FOR REVIEW ON REGULAR BASIS

These shall need to be reviewed by the Nomination & Remuneration Committee and the Board, from time to time.

CONCLUSION

Although the objective to statutorily provide for a Policy of remuneration of Directors, KMP and other employees is very laudable, the question would arise as to how seriously companies will implement it in letter and spirit. Only then the benefits will be visible as an important part of good corporate governance measures.

(Author can be reached at gangulyamitav57@gmail.com)

Click here to Read Other Articles of Amitav Ganguly

Sponsored

Author Bio

Mr. Amitav Ganguly is a Law Graduate and qualified Company Secretary with more than three decades of rich experience in senior positions; company secretarial, corporate legal affairs, management and corporate governance; in different industry sectors like investment, manufacturing and real estate. A View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Changes in Provisions Relating to Independent Directors SEBI Circular on Resignation of Stautory Auditors Analysis of amended SEBI Law of Insider Trading for Window Closure Public Vs. Private Company Some Aspects of Pledge of Shares Under SEBI Take Over Code View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031