This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CESTAT should consider merits before deciding the matter; 'Prima facie no case' cannot be the ground to decide the matter
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- CEAT Limited Vs The Commissioner of Central Excise (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Brief Facts of the Case
This Appeal by the assessee challenges the order passed on 12th June, 2014, by which the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (West) Zonal Customs Branch at Mumbai dealt with an application seeking dispensation of the condition of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending disposal of the Appeal. The assessee filed an Appeal aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise Mumbai-III Commissionerate (Adjudication order). The Adjudicating Authority confirmed a duty demand of Rs.6,59,36,795/- against the appellant assessee...
