Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re M/s. Sutherland Mortgage Services Inc. (GST AAR Kerala)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. KER/32/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/05/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re M/s. Sutherland Mortgage Services Inc. (GST AAR Kerala) 

From the statements and arguments of the applicant, it is evident that the question raised is whether the supply made by the applicant would qualify as export of service as defined in Section 2(6) of the IGST Act, 2017. Therefore, the question essentially involves the determination of place of supply which is not included in Section 97 (2) of the CGST Act, 2017 as a question on which advance ruling can be sought.

Advance Ruling authority has been constituted in exercise of the powers conferred by section 96 of the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which Act extends to the whole of the state of Kerala. This authority is a creature of statute and has to function within the legal boundary mandated by the Act. As the ‘place of supply’ is not covered by Section 97(2) of the Acts, this authority is helpless to answer the question raised in the application, as it is lacking jurisdiction to decide the issues. The jurisdiction of this authority does not extend to the questions on determination of ‘place of supply’.

FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, KERALA

M/s. Sutherland Mortgage Service Inc., USA has branch offices in India at Cochin, Mumbai and Chennai. The applicant is engaged in the business of providing information technology enables services such as mortgage orientation, primary servicing, special servicing, cash management and analytics and reporting. The Head Office prevented outsourcing of its work to any other third party. Therefore, M/s. Sutherland Mortgage Services Inc. India is entered into an inter-company agreement with the M/s. Sutherland Mortgage Services Inc. USA for providing services to the customers located outside India. The inter-company agreement is entered only for the purpose of transfer pricing regulation as the branch has no legal separate entity. M/s. Sutherland Mortgage Services Inc. USA has also entered into agreement with customers outside India for providing the services from USA and India branch. M/s. Sutherland Mortgage Services Inc. USA is reimbursing the branch at India for the costs incurred to perform the services and branch issues commercial invoice to Head Office at USA. The applicant has pointed out that M/s. Sutherland Mortgage Services Inc. India Branch has provided the services to the customers located outside India and not to Head Office and therefore services would qualify as export of services, which is considered as zero-rated supply in terms of Section 16 of the IGST Act. Hence the applicant requested advance ruling on the following:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031