Case Law Details
Case Name : Commissioner of Income-tax VS Cactus Imaging India (P.) Ltd. (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : T.C.(Appeal) Nos.921 & 922 of 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/04/2018
Related Assessment Year : 2003-04, 2004-05
Courts :
All High Courts Madras High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
CIT Vs. Cactus Imaging India (P.) Ltd. (Madras High Court)
It can be inferred that the machines ‘computer printers’ under consideration can either be called computers-printers, since a lot of independent functions done by the computers are done by these printers and they can be called an integral part of the computer system. It should be treated as part of the computer and an accessory to the Computer and depreciation at 60% should be allowed.
FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT JUDGMENT / ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:
T.S. Sivagnanam, J. – Heard Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue and Mr.R.Sivaraman, learned counsel for the respondent/assessee.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
