Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

Daily Dose of GST Update By CA Pradeep Jain

Taking further to our discussion, we are continuing our discussion the definitions  given under Section 2 of revised GST law and comparing the same with old model GST law to know the changes made in revised law:-

2(77) Principal place of business: the new definition reads as follows:

Principal place of business means the place of business specified as the principal place of business in the certificate of registration;

The old definition read as follows:

“principal place of business” means the place of business specified as the principal place of business in the certificate of registration where the taxable person keeps and maintains the accounts and records as specified under section 42 ;

The amendment bought in the definition is that principal place of the business will be the place mentioned in registration certificate irrespective of the location of books and accounts. However, the definition of “place of business” defined section 2(74) clears that it can be place where books of accounts are being kept.  This was necessary in view of the fact that currently in excise and service tax, registration are premises based and every premise has to maintain its own records. Following the old definition, every registered premise would have to be classified as principal place of business inviting litigation. Deleting the condition of keeping books of accounts has made the definition simple to follow and now the assessee can name any of his premises as principal place of business. But there is no need to keep books of accounts there only. It can be kept at any place of business.

2(79) Proper Officer: the new definition reads as follows:

Proper Officer in relation to any function to be performed under this  Act, means the officer of goods and services tax who is assigned that function by the Commissioner of CGST / SGST;

The old definition reads as follows:

“proper officer” in relation to any function to be performed under this Act, means the officer of goods and services tax who is assigned that function by the Board/Commissioner of SGST;

The amendment bought in this definition is that the authority to assign function to GST officers rest only with commissioners of SGST and CGST and not with CBEC, instructions issued by CBEC will no longer be binding on proper officers. The Commissioners under CGST/SGST will be independent to assign the functions and there won’t be any overriding of authority in absence of a parallel governing body. In fact all the definitions involving the board have been amended to remove the word ‘board’.

2(92) Services: The new definition reads as follows:

Service means anything other than goods;

Explanation 1.- Services include transactions in money but does not include money  and securities;

Explanation 2.- Services does not include transaction in money other than an activity relating to the use of money or its conversion by cash or by any other mode, from one form, currency or denomination, to another form, currency or denomination for which a separate consideration is charged.

The old definition read as follows:

“services’’ means anything other than goods; Explanation: Services include intangible property and actionable claim but does not include money.

The amendment bought in the definition is that Securities explicitly excluded from services definition. We have told in our earlier update that securities are excluded from the definition of “goods” under Section 2(49) also. Thus securities won’t be considered as goods or services and as a result, GST won’t be applicable on the same.  The definition has also been amended to specifically state that Services does not include transaction in money other than an activity relating to the use of money or its conversion by cash or by any other mode, from one form, currency or denomination, to another form, currency or denomination for which a separate consideration is charged. Thus the definition has been made more clear in respect of transaction in money to avoid any kind of litigation.

You may visit us at www.capradeepjain.com

Click to Read Other Articles of CA Pradeep Jain & His Team Members

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

  1. Deepak Rana says:

    When we registered our company (15 Feb 2022) & GST, we used the home address as a primary place of business. After couple of weeks, we signed the lease for an office (1 March) and it is where we run our business from. We have leases for both properties and pay rent for both but we didn’t add new office address to GST registration. Someone told me that we are required to re-sign the lease, pay stamp duty and then add it again as additional place of business. Is this correct or can we just add new office address as additional place of business regardless of around 2 months delay in adding it to the GST portal.

  2. Yogesh Kumar says:

    Delivery point in agreement with third party vendor for the ease of customer to collect their orders, can be called as Additional place of business????????

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031