Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax III Vs Panchmahal Steel Ltd (Gujarat High court at Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Admittedly, the assessee is not a dealer in foreign exchange. For the purpose of hedging the loss due to fluctuation in foreign exchange while implementing the export contracts, the assessee had entered into forward contract with the banks. In some cases, the export could not be executed and the assessee had to pay certain charges to the Bank and  thereby incurred certain expenses. These expenses the  assessee claimed by way  of expenditure towards business. We do not find that  the transaction can be stated to  be  in speculation as to cover under sub-section (5)  of section 43 of the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930