Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax III Vs Panchmahal Steel Ltd (Gujarat High court at Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Tax Appeal No. 131 of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/03/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Admittedly, the assessee is not a dealer in foreign exchange. For the purpose of hedging the loss due to fluctuation in foreign exchange while implementing the export contracts, the assessee had entered into forward contract with the banks. In some cases, the export could not be executed and the assessee had to pay certain charges to the Bank and  thereby incurred certain expenses. These expenses the  assessee claimed by way  of expenditure towards business. We do not find that  the transaction can be stated to  be  in speculation as to cover under sub-section (5)  of section 43 of the Act.

 HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
TAX APPEAL NO. 131 of 2013

 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031