Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Income tax Vs Madhukumar N. (HUF) (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal NO. 396 OF 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/03/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

Commissioner of Income tax

V/s.

Madhukumar N. (HUF)

IT Appeal NO. 396 OF 2009

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. Parv says:

    Respected All,
    In our case the local limit is not determinable by normal course, but the population is >10000 it is agricultural land,
    How do we come to know whether the land is eligible for LTCG or not
    & how do we know about the notification issued by the government. form where we know it.
    Pls help

  2. RAJAGOPALAN.R says:

    The title given  is misleading.
    What the HC has held is only that agrl land, even if within 8 kms from a Municipal limit, is not a ‘capital asset’   unless the area is covered by the necessary Notification.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031