Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs & C. Ex., Vapi Vs DNH Spinners (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. A/1476/2009-WZB/AHD10-7-2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/07/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

Credit cannot be denied on ground that, documents were not in the name of assessee’s factory but issued in the name of head office situated elsewhere

The documents were not in the name of the assessee’s factory situated at Silvassa but the same were issued in the name of the head office of the assessee situated at Mumbai. However, I find that there is otherwise no dispute about the input services received by the assessee. The substantive benefit cannot be denied on the procedural grounds.

IN THE CESTAT, WEST ZONAL BENCH, AHMEDABAD

[COURT NO. II]

Ms. Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031