Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT imposes costs for ‘recovery harassment’ on Assessing Officer

Case Law Details

Case Name
Shramjivi Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Vs. ACIT (ITAT Pune)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2006- 07
Advertisement
Shramjivi Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Vs. ACIT (ITAT Pune)- The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of KEC Interntional Ltd v/s. B.R. Balakrishnan (Supra) has been pleased to hold that generally coercive measures may not be adopted during the period provided by the Statute to go in appeal. In the present case, it remained the allegation of the appellant that recovery action was taken by the A.O by attaching bank account of the appellant u/s. 226(3) on 29.3.2010 on the basis of first appellate order passed on 3rd February 2010 and was served upon the assessee on 31st March 2010. Noting thes...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

1 Comment
  1. Such token costs hardly affect Revenue officers, as is generally believed that such meagre amounts hardly bother such power wielding officers ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *