Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Balwant Rai Wadhwa Vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : I.T.A No. 4806/Del/10
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/01/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2001- 2002
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Reopening U/s. 148 without service of reasons to the assessee before the expiry of period of 6 years renders reopening invalid

As the issuance of the s. 148 notice and the communication and furnishing of reasons go hand in hand, the reasons have to be supplied to the assessee before the expiry of period of 6 years. If this is not done, the validity of the s. 148 notice cannot be upheld. In any proceeding, whether civil or criminal, a summons issued without a copy of the plaint or complaint has to be construed as if no valid service of notice has been effected upon the defendant or respondents.

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘A’ NEW DELHI

BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER

AND

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Dilip chatterji Advocate says:

    Reopen of an closed assessment is invalid if the notice issued not Accompanied with the copy of reason to belief resulting the whole proceedings u/s 148 of ITAct 1961 invalid not sustainable in the eyes of law, accordingly copy of reason to belief should accompany the notice u/s148 is the precondition

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031