Case Law Details
Case Name : Shri Balwant Rai Wadhwa Vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2001- 2002
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Reopening U/s. 148 without service of reasons to the assessee before the expiry of period of 6 years renders reopening invalid
As the issuance of the s. 148 notice and the communication and furnishing of reasons go hand in hand, the reasons have to be supplied to the assessee before the expiry of period of 6 years. If this is not done, the validity of the s. 148 notice cannot be upheld. In any proceeding, whether civil or criminal, a summons issued without a copy of the plaint or complaint has to be construed as if no valid service of notice has been effected upon the defendant or respondents...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Reopen of an closed assessment is invalid if the notice issued not Accompanied with the copy of reason to belief resulting the whole proceedings u/s 148 of ITAct 1961 invalid not sustainable in the eyes of law, accordingly copy of reason to belief should accompany the notice u/s148 is the precondition